Re: #Why Amtrak is dying when we need it the most

On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:55:36 GMT, Demon Lord Henry Schmidt of
Confusion
<popesnarky.verwarring@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:16:28 -0400, Steve attempted to confuse the issue
>further by squeaking:
>> On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:06:46 -1200, "Steve" wrote:
>>>Oon Mun, 07 Jool 2008 04:52:26 GMT, Synzeeteec Netvurked Undrueed
>>>Respunseeble-a ffur Keelling und Yerdvurk vrute:
>>>>Hail Eris! On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:36:23 -0400, Eris Kallisti Discordia
>>>>was laughing at the antics of Steve, when they suddenly burst out in
>>>>tears:
>>>>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:18:59 GMT, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry
>>>>> Schmidt" wrote:
>>>>>>On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:57:16 -0400, Steve did most oddly state:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:49:05 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:05:52 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:22:53 GMT, David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:57:15 -0400, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >>On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:39:39 -0700, mariposas rand mair
>>>>>>>>> >> >>fheal wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >be specific
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >list anything you think is necessary service and show
to
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >make it pay for
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >itself
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >and what you dont list one can assume you claim is not
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >necessary
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> <LOL>   Any and all of what you mentioned..   for
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> instance, if people believe that police and firemen are
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> necessary, they will pay for them..  of course, there
are
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> those that might not be able to pay for them...   too
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> bad.....
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>okay
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>so your idea of successful society denies necessities to
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>poor people
>>>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> >>I'm not denying anything...  I'm just to wiling to pay for
>>>>>>>>> >> >>it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I can't parse that -- "to wiling"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, who said *you* were "denying"
>>>>>
>>>>> "just not to willing"
>>>>
>>>>Uh-huh. So basically, English was never your best course in school.
>>>
>>>Ectooelly, my Ingleesh ees fery guud..  my typeeng, hooefer, dues
>>>sooffffer..
>>>
>>>>>>Anyway, who said *you* were "denying"
>>>>>
>>>>> Se above..  "so your idea of ..... "
>>>>
>>>>In fact, you must have failed it multiple times from Grade 7 or 8
>>>>onwards. "So your idea of a successful society..." is a complete
>>>>subject, whereas "So your idea of..." is not, in this context. *Your
>>>>idea of a successful society* denies necessities to poor people,
>>>>regardless of what you yourself may think (or claim) you believe,
since
>>>>you actually said, in the following quote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> <LOL>   Any and all of what you mentioned..   for
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> instance, if people believe that police and firemen are
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> necessary, they will pay for them..  of course, there
are
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> those that might not be able to pay for them...   too
>>>>>>>>> >> >>>> bad.....
>>>>
>>>>How else should I parse that?
>>>
>>><Seegh>  ...thet sume-a peuple-a cunnut effffurd ffuremen...
>>>
>>>>>>anything? "So your idea of [a] successful society denies necessities
>>>>>>to poor people." That isn't about what you would deny.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it is...
>>>>
>>>>OK, so you would in fact deny emergency services to poor people, if
you
>>>>had any say.
>>>
>>>Nu...  perheps yuoo cuoold du a remedeeel reedeeng cuoorse...
>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> >That's an intriguing idea.  It means for example that you
can
>>>>>>>>> >> >expect fires that spread across most of the city destroying
>>>>>>>>> >> >most of it because the fire fighters only respond to them
>>>>>>>>> >> >after the situation is utterly uncontrollable.
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> That's a ridiculous claim..   a private fire brigade would
>>>>>>>>> >> spring into action any time their customers requested them...
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >what private fire brigade?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You poor thing...   are you having trouble keeping up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>no answer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>i win
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL>  You win an award for making an ignorant reply?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He wins your foam.
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> Like your opinion is worth anything?
>>>>
>>>>My opinion is informed. Yours is that of a dullard who failed remedial
>>>>reading over and over.
>>>
>>>Yuoor oopeeniun ees eendeed vurthless beyund zee hoomur eet prufeedes
>>>vhen yuoo preseent eet een poobleec.
>>>
>>>>>>Moffitt's, too. I note you still haven't answered the question: What
>>>>>>private fire brigade?
>>>>>
>>>>> You must be another loser leftist with a reading disability..  did
>>>>> anyone say there was a private fire brigade?
>>>>
>>>>My good colleague spooge illustrated your idiocy in that regard most
>>>>thoroughly. You did indeed say there would be a "private fire
brigade",
>>>
>>>Nupe, surry..   my menshun ooff a preefete-a ffure-a breegede-a ves
>>>noohere-a cluse-a tu a sooggesshun thet Ee knoo ooff sooch un inteety..
>>>
>>>..du vurk oon yuoor reedeeng sume-a beffure-a replyeeng next teeme..
>>>
>>>>and now you are frantically attempting to back-pedal from that bit of
>>>>cretinous half-thought by pretending you never said it. You are a
>>>>spankard, and may consider yourself thrashed.
>>>
>>><LOL> Nut herdly....
>> 
>> <LOL>   Apparently, I've backed another immature leftist coward into a
>> place they cannot find a way out of...
>
>No, you haven't, but don't let me stop you from thinking otherwise. If
you
>can't read header info, you can't, and that's all there is to it.

....and yet, here you are, demonstrating your inability to respond with
anything but immature gibberish, and therefore, proving my point.