Re: #Why Amtrak is dying when we need it the most

Steve <stevencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
news:r7n374pukapkdo49gu8s1vrh3540okseao@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 01:11:47 +0000 (UTC), spooge
> <spooge@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>Steve <stevencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>news:rlo274dge04ip6dg18s10af7k34obfuej3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>>
>>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:18:59 GMT, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry
>>> Schmidt" <popesnarky.godofodd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:57:16 -0400, Steve did most oddly state:
>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:49:05 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:05:52 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> >> On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:22:53 GMT, David Johnston wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:57:15 -0400, Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >>On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:39:39 -0700, mariposas rand mair
>>>>>>> >> >>fheal wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >>> Steve wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>> >> >>>> >be specific
>>>>>>> >> >>>> >list anything you think is necessary service and show
>>>>>>> >> >>>> >to make it pay for
>>>>>>> >> >>>> >itself
>>>>>>> >> >>>> >and what you dont list one can assume you claim is not
>>>>>>> >> >>>> >necessary
>>>>>>> >> >>>> 
>>>>>>> >> >>>> <LOL>   Any and all of what you mentioned..   for
>>>>>>> >> >>>> instance, if people believe that police and firemen are
>>>>>>> >> >>>> necessary, they will pay for them..  of course, there
>>>>>>> >> >>>> are those that might not be able to pay for them...  
>>>>>>> >> >>>> too bad..... 
>>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>>> >> >>>okay
>>>>>>> >> >>>so your idea of successful society denies necessities to
>>>>>>> >> >>>poor people
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >>I'm not denying anything...  I'm just to wiling to pay for
>>>>>>> >> >>it 
>>>>
>>>>I can't parse that -- "to wiling"? 
>>> 
>>> Anyway, who said *you* were "denying"
>>> 
>>> "just not to willing"
>>> 
>>>>Anyway, who said *you* were "denying"
>>> 
>>> Se above..  "so your idea of ..... "
>>> 
>>>>anything? "So your idea of [a] successful society denies necessities
>>>>to poor people." That isn't about what you would deny.
>>> 
>>> Yeah, it is...
>>> 
>>>>>>> >> >That's an intriguing idea.  It means for example that you
>>>>>>> >> >can expect fires that spread across most of the city
>>>>>>> >> >destroying most of it because the fire fighters only respond
>>>>>>> >> >to them after the situation is utterly uncontrollable.
>>>>>>> >> 
>>>>>>> >> That's a ridiculous claim..   a private fire brigade would
>>>>>>> >> spring into action any time their customers requested them...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >what private fire brigade?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You poor thing...   are you having trouble keeping up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>no answer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>i win
>>>>> 
>>>>> <LOL>  You win an award for making an ignorant reply?
>>>>
>>>>He wins your foam. 
>>> 
>>> <LOL> Like your opinion is worth anything?  
>>> 
>>>>Moffitt's, too. I note you still haven't answered the
>>>>question: What private fire brigade?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You must be another loser leftist with a reading disability..  did
>>> anyone say there was a private fire brigade?
>>
>>That would be... you:
> 
> Nope..   Sorry..  I made a reference to what a theoretical private
> fire brigade would or could do, but I never suggested that I knew of
> such an entity...    perhaps if you had a better education you'd
> understand that a person might identify an entity without claiming
> that it actually existed...    
> 
> Example:  the sentence, "you're as dumb as a box of rocks" does not
> suggest that I know of any particular box of rocks.

The point being, person who is in fact dumber than a box of rocks, you
were the first to bring the concept of a "private fire brigade" into the
discussion. 

Then, you asked if anyone said there was a "private fire brigade", so
I'm being helpful and showing you that yes, someone did say there was..
and it was you.  It's really simple, and you're a simpleton, so you
should be able to understand. 

I'll repost your own words for you again, because it's fun to watch you
cowardly snip your own words and disavow them at the same time. 

Here, have at it you dishonest little ****:
------
Xref: news alt.society.liberalism:2111365 talk.politics.misc:4401185
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:4893887 Path:
news.glorb.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gi
ganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernew
s.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:35:59
-0500 From: Steve <stevencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Newsgroups:
alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Subject:
Re: #Why Amtrak is dying when we need it the most Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008
11:34:00 -0400 Organization: old hippies smell bad
Message-ID: <p05v64t0ovkhoed9r62dl8r8l1oigon40m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References:
<mair_fheal-670602.04150605072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<3amu6450hqf894000qfs0ptme7ij9khtpc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<mair_fheal-B0BC85.04534605072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<l5ou64t2e1je1h7g6l6512nrp3rn3mci2m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<mair_fheal-863276.05302105072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<tlqu6415kn4h60m50140gf2hm8h8k4jcmk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<mair_fheal-549C17.06393905072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<q00v64lgjl5fr6mnrn5s7k6aliter00o5q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
<ra4v64d4hlgml5g7915lan1drvg2cqq4f2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent
1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
X-Trace:
sv3-iTPDhYN3Kih0QhiDdv2dhWnSVh4dv2faCU0JOu5zQ3VEFndVv/P+l+zIw77UE5pPUnSmn
2oDnITFuvV!kdACfFdKSulX7Qwc81euVY4/YdPVojbaLfnzTCr5CTeCUlWOHJ6h34Q6QIMwRE
x3mnPIjhr6Cqnu!QHwvpVA= X-Complaints-To:
www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure
to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we
will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.39

On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:22:53 GMT, David Johnston <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:57:15 -0400, Steve
><stevencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:39:39 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal
>><mair_fheal@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <tlqu6415kn4h60m50140gf2hm8h8k4jcmk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> Steve <stevencanyon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >be specific
>>>> >list anything you think is necessary service and show to make it
>>>> >pay for itself
>>>> >and what you dont list one can assume you claim is not necessary
>>>> 
>>>> <LOL>   Any and all of what you mentioned..   for instance, if
>>>> people believe that police and firemen are necessary, they will pay
>>>> for them..  of course, there are those that might not be able to
>>>> pay for them...   too bad.....
>>>
>>>okay
>>>so your idea of successful society denies necessities to poor people
>>
>>I'm not denying anything...  I'm just to wiling to pay for it
>
>That's an intriguing idea.  It means for example that you can expect
>fires that spread across most of the city destroying most of it
>because the fire fighters only respond to them after the situation is
>utterly uncontrollable.  

That's a ridiculous claim..   a private fire brigade would spring into
action any time their customers requested them...
---

Your words, your creation of the concept of a "private fire brigade".

Enjoy. 

-- 
Religion provides the means for the ignorant to declare with absolute
certainty that they know the unknowable.