Re: Another Republican Bigot Re****tedly Having Assumed Room Temperature

Gary DeWaay wrote:
> In article <g5017m$ubn$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
> Lamont.Cranston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Lamont Cranston says... 

>> There is no evidence that your belief is accurate and a 
>> substantial amount of evidence that the opposing belief is. 
>> How many homo***uals do you know?  How well do you know 
>> them?  Most homo***uals will tell you that they KNEW that 
>> they were homo***ual by their early teens.  By the way, when 
>> did you choose to be hetero***ual? 
>>
>>
> 
> 
> I have never seen a Usenet rightie answer such questions.
> 
> Watch David run away from it...

What is there to run away from?

I am aware of all the arguments, and the fact remains that there is no 
evidence that homo***uality is inborn.

One claiming that they "always knew" is not proof.

This is the point where most sup****ters of the homo***ual movement will 
claim victory. If you feel such a need, go ahead. I will continue to 
wait for the scientific community to make this case.