On 27 Feb 2005 14:25:04 -0800, "Material" <material_fb1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Listening to you guys one gets the impression it was Bush who fought
the VC in the Nam and Kerry who snorted coke at his parents home in
Greenwich.
> John Kerry, an American Vietcong
>
>Source: http://khmervision.free.fr/do***ents/in-thought04kerry.htm
>
>By Mahendra http://khmervision.free.fr/index.htm
>
>The junior senator from Massachusetts , John Forbes Kerry, was born on
>Dec. 11, 1943 . Kerry's father was a career foreign service officer for
>the U.S. State Department. His mother was a member of an aristocratic
>American family, the Forbes (Re****ted the online newhour )
>
>John Kerry is one talkative popular person, the pet of the scene,
>unfortunately many times John Kerry has used his divine skill and
>popularity against the policy of his own country.
>
>During the Vietnam War, this communist adept took side with the
>communism, enemies of his own country, and has led the harsh
>protestation against the policy of USA which helped the communism and
>Vietcong to shamefully fall USA .
>
>'I'm an internationalist, said John Kerry during an ill-fated
>campaign for U.S. Congress in 1970. "I'd like to see our troops
>dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United
>Nations."
>
>By pronouncing this hallucinating word John Kerry did clearly mark his
>believing filiation which is the red ideology.
>
>But what it is applied being ideologically 'Internationalist'?
>Being gods, being pacifist people, being neo Stalinians, neo Leninian
>or being intellectually disoriented? Does this kind of ideology can be
>coexistable or it just a kind of iceberg to hide other criminal secret
>agenda?
>
>As for Untied Nations, M. Kerry appears to ****tray it as the holy god
>organisation, the only that can decide the fate of the world. But M.
>Kerry seems to have a short memory! Did he ever be concerned that,
>numerous crime against humanity the most atrocious and inhuman are
>committed by the permanent members of the United Nations Organisation,
>directly or indirectly. For various interests whether politics,
>economics or ideology; those influenced countries did employed the big
>averages to seize their needs in detriment of millions innocent life.
>The inter-imperialist rival among the influenced countries whether
>between French and USA , between red ideology and freed world did kill
>many millions life and left other millions suffer endlessly now and
>then. Does M. John Kerry ever concerned about it?
>
>Does M. Kerry ever be conscious that by helping Vietcong to overcome
>USA ( free world), he directly opened the door of the killing field
>where millions of innocent people were perished by various ways in the
>hands of the Khmero-vietcong and the communists.
>
>Do M. Kerry ever learned that, in spite of what French can claim to the
>world through its charming and sweet political speech or propaganda and
>throught its giganteque world wide anti war crusade, French, his
>creature, is one of the redoubtable colonial empires, the one who has
>created, sup****ted and maintained many horrible dictators around the
>world to work for its interest whether politics, economics or ideology.
>French did leave many appealing genocide in the countries that were
>invaded or colonised by French whether in Africa, in Asia ...etc. Then
>there is no such pacifice crusade from Frenc and all its clan but a
>fierce ideological and economics war.
>
>Behind the antiwar crusade of Charles de Gaulle during the cool war,
>hided the fierce inter-imperialist, ideological and economic war.
>Europe as French and the leftist world had one interest to strap down
>USA . The same thing repeated again during the gigantesque anti-Iraqist
>war led by Jack Chirac (French). The communist of antiwar Vietnam of
>the cool war were transformed into peace lovers and united again to
>beat USA .
>
>But des M. Kerry is really believe that the people who protested
>against American operation whether in Indochina or elsewhere in the
>world; are the so called 'Internationalists' or peace lover people?
>Then if M. Kerry was not mentally seriously touched, he must be
>victimised by a gigantesque ideological manipulation as many other
>millions American leftist.
>
>Of course, Europe, French, Charles de Gaulle, (recently Chirac) did
>have their very own interest and secret agenda to lead that immense
>anti-American crusade against USA under the appearance of Anti-war but
>what do Kerry and his clan earn to lead such shocking appealing treason
>act against his own country with their foes of his Nation? That's a
>such high treason against a Nation and it is politically suicidal. As
>for the comparing we can surely compare the high treason of John Kerry
>as one M. Sihanouk, king of Cambodia if not king of Vietcong
>
>The whole life of M. Sihanouk Norodom who was ever the pure creature of
>French, resembles strangely to the one John Kerry. All his life is all
>about a horrible treason against his own country and people for his
>stupidity.
>
>The military service that Kerry offered to his country resembled
>strangely to a titanic complot - Kerry was there to offer his free
>service to the enemies of his country and back with a tone of false
>testimonies armed to strangulate, pound his own kind and country
>meanwhile his allowed the Vietcong and all the leftist world
>irreversibly beat his country. What then M. Kerry win from this high
>treason? Certainly not but his irresponsible and stupid act has divided
>USA into two different worlds, two different ideological world which
>weaken USA till today.
>
>According to The American News dated May 17, 2004 , after graduating
>from Yale, Kerry enlisted in the Navy and was sent to Vietnam . He
>received an honorable discharge, along with three purple hearts for
>minor injuries, a bronze star, and a silver star for valor.
>
>Kerry returned from Vietnam with renewed political ambitions. His big
>op****tunity arrived when he delivered a radical, anti-American
>statement against the Vietnam War before the U.S. Senate Foreign
>Relations Committee on April 22, 1971 .
>
>Kerry became National Coordinator of a group calling itself Vietnam
>Veterans Against the War (VVAW) and testified on behalf of the group.
>Beside Kerry during the Senate testimony was fellow VVAW leader Al
>Hubbard, a man who had lied about serving in Vietnam and had ties to
>the leftist, revolutionary Black Panther Party. VVAW was a radical
>group of leftists, eventually taken over by revolutionary Communists.
>Notorious traitor "Hanoi Jane" Fonda was the VVAW's "Honorary
>National Coordinator." The politically ambitious Kerry was forced to
>dissociate himself from the organization in November 1971, during a
>meeting of VVAW in Kansas City where the assassination of U.S. senators
>was discussed as a possible strategy for ending the Vietnam War. The
>following month, the Boston Herald-Traveler (December 12, 1971) noted
>that VVAW rallies were "characterized by an abundance of Vietcong
>flags, clenched fists raised in the air, and placards plainly bearing
>legends in sup****t of China, Cuba, the USSR, North Korea and the Hanoi
>government." (Qote)
>
>The medals Kerry earned from Vietnam service became props during his
>antiwar activism as well as during his political career. As an antiwar
>organizer, Kerry participated in a protest in front of the Capitol
>building on April 23, 1971 , in which he and other veterans threw
>combat medals over a fence in protest against the war.
>
>Kerry was a hero?! Certainly "NOT" but an American TREASONER and an
>un-regretting cool blood criminal who cooperated with the criminals and
>the foes of his country to destroy the interest of his own country -
>YES
|
