"John Schilling" <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:0hha3356k16luhfq0i0s0c1mmutdftjjgh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:02:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje
> <pNaonStpealmtje@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On a sunny day (28 Apr 2007 18:25:32 -0700) it happened AirRaid
>><airraid1400@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>><1177809932.327083.323020@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
>>
>>>"We do not understand ... what is happening in Europe now that
>>>requires such aggressive actions," Putin said. "We see no arguments
>>>for deploying the missile ****eld in Europe."
>>
>>I have to agree here with Putin.
>>
>>The mad Bu****sts just want an arms race to fill the wallets of the
>>US arms manufacturers, giving school kids guns is not enough.
>>And de-stabilising Europe has long been a thought they have played with.
>>We can only hope Bush is hanged and a Clinton democratic government will
>>show more sanity.
>>
>>If N Korea or Iran _ever_ started firing missiles into Europe, we
>>(for example France) could nuke those countries flat without any help
>>from Uncle Sammy.
>
> And yet you (for example the Czech Republic) are signing up to host the
> US missile defense system.
>
> Hmm, it's almost as if the Czechs don't entirely trust the French or
> even the British to guarantee their security. Can't imagine why...
Couldn't be historical analysis, could it? "Peace in our time," bought by
a
sell-out of Czechoslovakia by Chamberlain and Daladier in 1939? Not, of
course, that we were any more use to the Czechs than the British or
French,
sitting here on this side of the lake in splendid isolation back then -
but
now, even a few interceptors are better than empty assurances.
|
