Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Politics Theory > Re: FBI Deputiz...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 2647 of 2770
Post > Topic >>

Re: FBI Deputizes Business - Shoot to Kill

by Defendario <Defendario@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 10, 2008 at 05:45 PM

TY for the head's up, Doreen.  Everyone should take note of this.

Visual Purple wrote:
> Exclusive! The FBI Deputizes Business
> By Matthew Rothschild, February 7, 2008
> 
> Today, more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are
> working quietly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
> The members of this rapidly growing group, called InfraGard, receive
> secret warnings of terrorist threats before the public does--and, at
> least on one occasion, before elected officials. In return, they
> provide information to the government, which alarms the ACLU. But
> there may be more to it than that. One business executive, who showed
> me his InfraGard card, told me they have permission to "shoot to kill"
> in the event of martial law.
> InfraGard is "a child of the FBI," says Michael Hershman, the chairman
> of the advisory board of the InfraGard National Members Alliance and
> CEO of the Fairfax Group, an international consulting firm.
> InfraGard started in Cleveland back in 1996, when the private sector
> there cooperated with the FBI to investigate cyber threats.
> "Then the FBI cloned it," says Phyllis Schneck, chairman of the board
> of directors of the InfraGard National Members Alliance, and the prime
> mover behind the growth of InfraGard over the last several years.
> InfraGard itself is still an FBI operation, with FBI agents in each
> state overseeing the local InfraGard chapters. (There are now eighty-
> six of them.) The alliance is a nonprofit organization of private
> sector InfraGard members.
> "We are the owners, operators, and experts of our critical
> infrastructure, from the CEO of a large company in agriculture or high
> finance to the guy who turns the valve at the water utility," says
> Schneck, who by day is the vice president of research integration at
> Secure Computing.
> "At its most basic level, InfraGard is a partner****p between the
> Federal Bureau of Investigation and the private sector," the InfraGard
> website states. "InfraGard chapters are geographically linked with FBI
> Field Office territories."
> In November 2001, InfraGard had around 1,700 members. As of late
> January, InfraGard had 23,682 members, according to its website,
> www.infragard.net, which adds that "350 of our nation's Fortune 500
> have a representative in InfraGard."
> To join, each person must be sponsored by "an existing InfraGard
> member, chapter, or partner organization." The FBI then vets the
> applicant. On the application form, prospective members are asked
> which aspect of the critical infrastructure their organization deals
> with. These include: agriculture, banking and finance, the chemical
> industry, defense, energy, food, information and telecommunications,
> law enforcement, public health, and trans****tation.
> FBI Director Robert Mueller addressed an InfraGard convention on
> August 9, 2005. At that time, the group had less than half as many
> members as it does today. "To date, there are more than 11,000 members
> of InfraGard," he said. "From our perspective that amounts to 11,000
> contacts . . . and 11,000 partners in our mission to protect America."
> He added a little later, "Those of you in the private sector are the
> first line of defense."
> He urged InfraGard members to contact the FBI if they "note suspicious
> activity or an unusual event." And he said they could sic the FBI on
> "disgruntled employees who will use knowledge gained on the job
> against their employers."
> In an interview with InfraGard after the conference, which is featured
> prominently on the InfraGard members' website, Mueller says: "It's a
> great program."
> The ACLU is not so sanguine.
> "There is evidence that InfraGard may be closer to a cor****ate TIPS
> program, turning private-sector cor****ations--some of which may be in a
> position to observe the activities of millions of individual customers--
> into surrogate eyes and ears for the FBI," the ACLU warned in its
> August 2004 re****t The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: How the
> American Government Is Conscripting Businesses and Individuals in the
> Construction of a Surveillance Society.
> InfraGard is not readily accessible to the general public. Its
> communications with the FBI and Homeland Security are beyond the reach
> of the Freedom of Information Act under the "trade secrets" exemption,
> its website says. And any conversation with the public or the media is
> supposed to be carefully rehearsed.
> "The interests of InfraGard must be protected whenever presented to
> non-InfraGard members," the website states. "During interviews with
> members of the press, controlling the image of InfraGard being
> presented can be difficult. Proper preparation for the interview will
> minimize the risk of embarrassment. . . . The InfraGard leader****p and
> the local FBI representative should review the submitted questions,
> agree on the predilection of the answers, and identify the appropriate
> interviewee. . . . Tailor answers to the expected audience. . . .
> Questions concerning sensitive information should be avoided."
> One of the advantages of InfraGard, according to its leading members,
> is that the FBI gives them a heads-up on a secure ****tal about any
> threatening information related to infrastructure disruption or
> terrorism.
> The InfraGard website advertises this. In its list of benefits of
> joining InfraGard, it states: "Gain access to an FBI secure
> communication network complete with VPN encrypted website, webmail,
> listservs, message boards, and much more."
> InfraGard members receive "almost daily updates" on threats "emanating
> from both domestic sources and overseas," Hershman says.
> "We get very easy access to secure information that only goes to
> InfraGard members," Schneck says. "People are happy to be in the
> know."
> On November 1, 2001, the FBI had information about a potential threat
> to the bridges of California. The alert went out to the InfraGard
> member****p. Enron was notified, and so, too, was Barry Davis, who
> worked for Morgan Stanley. He notified his brother Gray, the governor
> of California.
> "He said his brother talked to him before the FBI," recalls Steve
> Maviglio, who was Davis's press secretary at the time. "And the
> governor got a lot of grief for releasing the information. In his
> defense, he said, 'I was on the phone with my brother, who is an
> investment banker. And if he knows, why shouldn't the public know?' "
> Maviglio still sounds perturbed about this: "You'd think an elected
> official would be the first to know, not the last."
> In return for being in the know, InfraGard members cooperate with the
> FBI and Homeland Security. "InfraGard members have contributed to
> about 100 FBI cases," Schneck says. "What InfraGard brings you is
> reach into the regional and local communities. We are a 22,000-member
> vetted body of subject-matter experts that reaches across seventeen
> matrixes. All the different stovepipes can connect with InfraGard."
> Schneck is proud of the relation****ps the InfraGard Members Alliance
> has built with the FBI. "If you had to call 1-800-FBI, you probably
> wouldn't bother," she says. "But if you knew Joe from a local meeting
> you had with him over a donut, you might call them. Either to give or
> to get. We want everyone to have a little black book."
> This black book may come in handy in times of an emergency. "On the
> back of each member****p card," Schneck says, "we have all the numbers
> you'd need: for Homeland Security, for the FBI, for the cyber center.
> And by calling up as an InfraGard member, you will be listened to."
> She also says that members would have an easier time obtaining a
> "special telecommunications card that will enable your call to go
> through when others will not."
> This special status concerns the ACLU.
> "The FBI should not be creating a privileged class of Americans who
> get special treatment," says Jay Stanley, public education director of
> the ACLU's technology and liberty program. "There's no 'business
> class' in law enforcement. If there's information the FBI can share
> with 22,000 cor****ate bigwigs, why don't they just share it with the
> public? That's who their real 'special relation****p' is supposed to be
> with. Secrecy is not a party favor to be given out to friends. . . .
> This bears a disturbing resemblance to the FBI's handing out 'goodies'
> to cor****ations in return for folding them into its domestic
> surveillance machinery."
> When the government raises its alert levels, InfraGard is in the loop.
> For instance, in a press release on February 7, 2003, the Secretary of
> Homeland Security and the Attorney General announced that the national
> alert level was being raised from yellow to orange. They then listed
> "additional steps" that agencies were taking to "increase their
> protective measures." One of those steps was to "provide alert
> information to InfraGard program."
> "They're very much looped into our readiness capability," says Amy
> Kudwa, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security. "We
> provide speakers, as well as do joint presentations [with the FBI]. We
> also train alongside them, and they have participated in readiness
> exercises."
> On May 9, 2007, George Bush issued National Security Presidential
> Directive 51 entitled "National Continuity Policy." In it, he
> instructed the Secretary of Homeland Security to coordinate with
> "private sector owners and operators of critical infrastructure, as
> appropriate, in order to provide for the delivery of essential
> services during an emergency."
> Asked if the InfraGard National Members Alliance was involved with
> these plans, Schneck said it was "not directly participating at this
> point." Hershman, chairman of the group's advisory board, however,
> said that it was.
> InfraGard members, sometimes hundreds at a time, have been used in
> "national emergency preparation drills," Schneck acknowledges.
> "In case something happens, everybody is ready," says Norm Arendt, the
> head of the Madison, Wisconsin, chapter of InfraGard, and the safety
> director for the consulting firm Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
> "There's been lots of discussions about what happens under an
> emergency."
> One business owner in the United States tells me that InfraGard
> members are being advised on how to prepare for a martial law situation
> --and what their role might be. He showed me his InfraGard card, with
> his name and e-mail address on the front, along with the InfraGard
> logo and its slogan, "Partner****p for Protection." On the back of the
> card were the emergency numbers that Schneck mentioned.
> This business owner says he attended a small InfraGard meeting where
> agents of the FBI and Homeland Security discussed in astoni****ng
> detail what InfraGard members may be called upon to do.
> "The meeting started off innocuously enough, with the speakers talking
> about cor****ate espionage," he says. "From there, it just progressed.
> All of a sudden we were knee deep in what was expected of us when
> martial law is declared. We were expected to share all our resources,
> but in return we'd be given specific benefits." These included, he
> says, the ability to travel in restricted areas and to get people out.
> But that's not all.
> "Then they said when--not if--martial law is declared, it was our
> responsibility to protect our ****tion of the infrastructure, and if we
> had to use deadly force to protect it, we couldn't be prosecuted," he
> says.
> I was able to confirm that the meeting took place where he said it
> had, and that the FBI and Homeland Security did make presentations
> there. One InfraGard member who attended that meeting denies that the
> subject of lethal force came up. But the whistleblower is 100 percent
> certain of it. "I have nothing to gain by telling you this, and
> everything to lose," he adds. "I'm so nervous about this, and I'm not
> someone who gets nervous."
> Though Schneck says that FBI and Homeland Security agents do make
> presentations to InfraGard, she denies that InfraGard members would
> have any civil patrol or law enforcement functions. "I have never
> heard of InfraGard members being told to use lethal force anywhere,"
> Schneck says.
> The FBI adamantly denies it, also. "That's ridiculous," says Catherine
> Milhoan, an FBI spokesperson. "If you want to quote a businessperson
> saying that, knock yourself out. If that's what you want to print,
> fine."
> But one other InfraGard member corroborated the whistleblower's
> account, and another would not deny it.
> Christine Moerke is a business continuity consultant for Alliant
> Energy in Madison, Wisconsin. She says she's an InfraGard member, and
> she confirms that she has attended InfraGard meetings that went into
> the details about what kind of civil patrol function--including
> engaging in lethal force--that InfraGard members may be called upon to
> perform.
> "There have been discussions like that, that I've heard of and
> participated in," she says.
> Curt Haugen is CEO of S'Curo Group, a company that does "strategic
> planning, business continuity planning and disaster recovery, physical
> and IT security, policy development, internal control, personnel
> selection, and travel safety," according to its website. Haugen tells
> me he is a former FBI agent and that he has been an InfraGard member
> for many years. He is a huge booster. "It's the only true organization
> where there is the public-private partner****p," he says. "It's all who
> knows who. You know a face, you trust a face. That's what makes it
> work."
> He says InfraGard "absolutely" does emergency preparedness exercises.
> When I ask about discussions the FBI and Homeland Security have had
> with InfraGard members about their use of lethal force, he says: "That
> much I cannot comment on. But as a private citizen, you have the right
> to use force if you feel threatened."
> "We were assured that if we were forced to kill someone to protect our
> infrastructure, there would be no repercussions," the whistleblower
> says. "It gave me goose bumps. It chilled me to the bone."
> 
> Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine and the
> author of "You Have No Rights: Stories of America in an Age of
> Repression." This article, "The FBI Deputizes Business," is the cover
> story of the March issue
> 
> Source: http://tinyurl.com/yraxzj
> 
> Also see: http://www.infragard.net/
> D2
>
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: FBI Deputizes Business - Shoot to Kill
Defendario <Defendario  2008-02-10 17:45:13 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 14:40:30 CDT 2008.