Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Government > Politics Theory > Re: Pre-Incan S...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 3 Topic 2670 of 2807
Post > Topic >>

Re: Pre-Incan Structures Found - How Far Back DOES "Civilization" Go

by ufkaura@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 20, 2008 at 07:42 AM

On 17 Mar, 12:42, b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (B1ackwater) wrote:
> CNN
> LIMA, Peru (AP) -- Archaeologists have discovered the ruins of an
> ancient temple, roadway and irrigation systems at a famed fortress
> overlooking theIncacapital of Cuzco, according to officials involved
> with the dig.
>
> The temple on the periphery of the Sacsayhuaman fortress casts added
> light on pre-Incacultures of Peru, showing that the site had
> religious as well as military aims, according to researchers.
>
> It includes 11 rooms thought to have held mummies and idols, lead
> archaeologist Oscar Rodriguez told The Associated Press.
>
> The team of archaeologists that made the discoveries believes the
> structures predated theIncaempire but were then significantly
> developed and expanded.
>
> "It's from both theIncaand pre-Incacultures; it has a sequence,"
> Wa****ngton Camacho, director of the Sacsayhuaman Archaeological Park,
> told the AP on Thursday. "The Incas entered and changed the form of
> the temple, as it initially had a more rustic architecture."
>
> Archaeologists are still waiting for carbon dating tests, but Camacho
> said their calculations about the facilities' age are sup****ted by
> historical references such as ceramics and construction style.
>
> Previous carbon-14 dating of Sacsayhuaman revealed that the Killke
> culture constructed the fortress in the 1100s, said Peruvian
> archaeologist Luis Lumbreras, former director of Peru's National
> Culture Institute and an expert on Cuzco's pre-Incan cultures. He was
> not involved in the dig.
>
> The Killke occupied the region from 900 to 1200 A.D., prior to the
> arrival of the Incas.
>
> - - - - -
>
> =A0 =A0Mesopotamia, Indus valley, Cathay, Egypt, S.America ...
> =A0 =A0it seems that "civilization" with all the usual trimmings
> =A0 =A0is a hidden 'emergent property' of humanity. Once some
> =A0 =A0critical mass ofpeoplecome together, random collections
> =A0 =A0of tribally-organized hunter-gatherers and dirt farmers
> =A0 =A0suddenly, rapidly, transform - producing technologically-
> =A0 =A0advanced civilzations with a suprisingly similar "look & feel".
> =A0 =A0The similarity of the pattern and 'look & feel' suggest a
> =A0 =A0genetic, 'hard-wired', factor.
>
> =A0 =A0But where did this 'super-organization' capacity COME from ?
> =A0 =A0What kept it alive, but unexpressed, over hundreds of thousands
> =A0 =A0of years until critical population densities were reached ?
>
> =A0 =A0Or, has it always been there, excess capability, but merely
> =A0 =A0seen as the usual heirarchical social organization of small
> =A0 =A0groups ? But why the over-capacity ? Why not JUST ENOUGH
> =A0 =A0organizing capacity to handle the usual small groups which
> =A0 =A0were the norm during the vast majority of sapiens-sapiens
> =A0 =A0roughly 200,000 year existence ?
>
> =A0 =A0Or were there ice-age supercultures too, environments
> =A0 =A0that would have favored and honed superorganizational
> =A0 =A0genetics ? With smallish populations, most would bave
> =A0 =A0been on seashores and major rivers ... drowned when the
> =A0 =A0glaciers melted, the remains now hundreds of feet below
> =A0 =A0current sea level. And our immediate 'cousins' - the
> =A0 =A0neanderthals and Heidelbergensis - did they also posess
> =A0 =A0social superorganizational abilities ? Perhaps even
> =A0 =A0a few bona-fide 'civilizations' also obliterated by
> =A0 =A0the ice and its later melting ? Dredging of the sea
> =A0 =A0floor, especially in the Med, may one day bring up
> =A0 =A0relics - deep under the water and especially the MUD
> =A0 =A0caused by glacial-melt floods.
>
> =A0 =A0It clearly doesn't take all THAT manypeopleto create
> =A0 =A0the 'critical mass' which spawns civilization-as-we-
> =A0 =A0know-it with buildings, math, writing, astronomy,
> =A0 =A0moderate technology and such. No reason such critical
> =A0 =A0m***** didn't happen time and again ... creating
> =A0 =A0history before what we know as history ... the bits
> =A0 =A0and pieces pulverized and scattered by relentless
> =A0 =A0forces of the ice. No, nothing like the nutty
> =A0 =A0elaborations of Platos 'Atlantis' with exotic metals
> =A0 =A0and modernistic tech, but 'regular' towns and cities
> =A0 =A0of wood and mud-bricks.

I have read your article and it is very interesting
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Pre-Incan Structures Found - How Far Back DOES "Civilization" Go
bw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B1  2008-03-17 12:42:34 
Re: Pre-Incan Structures Found - How Far Back DOES "Civilization
ufkaura@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-20 07:42:39 
Re: Pre-Incan Structures Found - How Far Back DOES "Civilization
victoria.eriemo@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-20 07:42:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 1:43:13 CDT 2008.