On Apr 23, 10:20=A0pm, jimz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > This comment annoyed me: =A0"But do you really expect me to provide
that=
> > to you?" =A0I am tired of all kinds of absurd assertions about Tibet
and=
> > the DL w/o any evidence.
>
> I didn't intend to annoy you with that statement. I just meant that I,
> like you, am limited in my proof to telling you what I hear from the
> media and on the internet.
>
> > Yes, I believe in the DL having peaceful dialog with HJT, which HJT
has
> > absolutely refused, while calling the DL all sorts of names, such as
> > "devil" etc. =A0For myself, I will call it how I see it when
assertions
> > are made that are improper. =A0But in general you may note that most
of =
my
> > dialogue is civil.
>
> > Robert
>
> HJT says that he will talk with the DL at any time, if the DL refrains
> from inciting rebellion.
>
> How was my assertion "improper"? Like you, I am only quoting things
> that I hear in the media and read on the internet.
Because even when the Dalai Lama says he is not asking for
independence, Hu says the same thing over and over. It is not an
honest call for dialog from Hu. In his mind he is "stalling" until the
Dalai Lama dies. He thinks then the problem will go away. He could not
be more wrong. It is a very dangerous stance on the part of the
Chinese.
|
