Re: China To Talk To Dalai

On 27 Apr 2008 07:54:01 -0500, "Toby" <kymarto@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"baldeagle" <botakeagle@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
>news:0c148ca5-b1be-4919-80d2-491cd2cb9d36@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Apr 26, 9:17 pm, CKSF <ck_in_...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Apr 26, 8:00?am, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 26, 3:11 pm, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>>
>> > > On Apr 25, 8:10 pm, Yu <yuga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > China ?has ?just ?reiterated ?her ?conditions ?for ?TALK-:
>> > > > > Dalai ?to ?declare ?to ?the ?world ?that ?Taiwan ?and ?Tibet
>> > > > > are ?an ?inalienable ?part ?of ?China. ?etc ?etc.
>> > > > > Stop ?disrupting ?the ?Olympics ?etc ?etc
>> > > > > Let ?us ?"look ?and ?see" ?what ?tricks ?the ?Dalai ?has ?up
>> > > > > his ?sleeves.
>>
>> > > > China took the same position long before this.
>> > > > I ve not noticed any change in China's position.
>> > > > May be the Dalai Lama is willing to meet those conditions now.
>>
>> > > Nice try, Mr. Yu. The fact is that *neither* side has in essence
>> > > changed what they have been saying for years. So what has changed?
>>
>> > Dalai Lama now says he sup****t the Olympics,
>> > against boycott, ...and he no longer want independence
>> > for Tibet.
>> > This much has changed.
>>
>> Bull****. The Dalai Lama had never advocated Independece for Tibet -
>> not since 1976!
>
>You contradicted yourself inside one sentence.....You said Dalai
>Lama NEVER advocated independence....and said "not since
>1976".
>You are wrong on both counts.... Dalai Lama has been
>advocating independence until recently.....he has continued to
>do so ....long after  1976. ( read his speech given in the
>parliament of Lithuania...on 1.10.1991 )
>
>http://www.tibet.com/DL/vilnius.html
> He said: "In our own case, the case of Tibet, we have tried
>to struggle for freedom......I wish my people's suffering would
>also come to an end and that they too could celebrate such
>freedom..."
>
>Perhaps your English is not so good. Freedom and independence are two 
>different things. One can be free without being independent, and one can 
>also be independent without being free, like China.

Perhaps your stupid trick is not so good. Everybody knows freedom and
independence is the same thing in the ****ing mind of you stupid
western assholes. As for China, China is independent and free. That's
why you can't do **** in interfering with Chinese internal affairs.