On Apr 29, 10:28=A0am, "ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 12:29=A0pm, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > On Apr 29, 11:36 am, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > >>> On Apr 29, 9:54 am, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>> ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > >>>>> On Apr 29, 6:02 am, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>>>> CharlesLiu wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 28, 7:25 pm, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:37:37 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 3:30?pm, "ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 1:31?am, Lproud...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 27, 7:03?pm, CharlesLiu <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:=
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It happened agin. First it was petite children's TV show
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> host Konnie Huq ?in London, then it's crippled
paralympian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jin Jin - now a 17 year old Japanese table tennis
olympian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ai Fukuhara, who trains in China and has been a good will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ambassador for Japan and China, was jumpped by a Tibetan
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> from Taiwan:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/cn/thread-38991-1-1.html
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you people pick on someone yor own size,
instead
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> of going after little girls? One legged little girles
too?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Man, you people must fee real brave.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> What do you expect from the spokeman of Voice of Tibet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Attacking handicap girl in wheel chair is FANTASTIC.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dd9Amlz2Jvro
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> A lot of these Tibetan exiles are misguided. Many of these
> > >>>>>>>>>> folks have never been in Tibet. The Tibet on their mind is
> > >>>>>>>>>> the real Tibet. Yet they think they are better than the
> > >>>>>>>>>> millions of real Tibetans in Tibet. Their means is also
odd.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Recently, I begin to think they are not responding to the
> > >>>>>>>>>> needs of the real Tibetans. These exiles are a frustrated
> > >>>>>>>>>> bunch. And they are responding to what have bappened in the
> > >>>>>>>>>> west. ?Since China ba****ng is becoming fahsionable, they
> > >>>>>>>>>> just want to be at the center of this China and Chinese
> > >>>>>>>>>> ba****ng party. Hence they will do all sorts of strange
> > >>>>>>>>>> things to attract attention. Luckily, they can also get
some
> > >>>>>>>>>> money from westrn countries.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> What the spokeman of Vocie of Tibet siad is revealing. His
> > >>>>>>>>>> calculation is not about Tibet. His primarily concern is
> > >>>>>>>>>> about international publicity. However, the Tibet problem
is
> > >>>>>>>>>> a Chinese problem. The solution may go through the Chinese
> > >>>>>>>>>> poeple. However, these exiles's protest and Chinese ba****ng
> > >>>>>>>>>> are carried out to enrage the Chinese poeple ?and make
their
> > >>>>>>>>>> goal further and further away. A new development in China
is
> > >>>>>>>>>> that some now said it openly "Anyone who negotiates with
the
> > >>>>>>>>>> DL clique is a traitor."
>
> > >>>>>>>>> It seems that even the poor one-legged fencer is now being
> > >>>>>>>>> branded a traitor by many Chinese. Funny how people on this
NG=
> > >>>>>>>>> talk a lot about how mean a few people in France were to her
> > >>>>>>>>> but keep quiet about what Chinese are doing to her. You guys
> > >>>>>>>>> sure have a lot of double standards...
>
> > >>>>>>>>> "Someone goes to France once and thinks
> > >>>>>>>>> she's French. Jin Jing speaks with the voice of an utterly
> > >>>>>>>>> brainless evil-eyed wolf traitor."
>
> > >>>>>>>> Nothing but the disinformation service of your western
> > >>>>>>>> propaganda
>
> > >>>>>>> You bet. There was a minority voice critical to Jin Jin, but
the=
> > >>>>>>> majority voice of reason in China blogsphere has came out in
> > >>>>>>> sup****t of her.
>
> > >>>>>>> Of course China hater like BO would rather ignore that:
>
> >
>>>>>>>http://www.google.com/search?q=3D%E9%87%91%E6%99%B6+%E6%B1%89%E5%=
A5%B8
>
> > >>>>>>> =93Jin Jin does not sup****t Carfore boycott=94
> > >>>>>>> =93If Jin Jin can be labeled HJ, who can=92t?=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Why call Jin Jin HJ?=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Nationalist =93Boxers=94 call Jin Jin HJ=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Shocked to see Jin Jin labeled HJ=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Jin Jin=92s one sentence turning her into HJ, sending chill
u=
p
> > >>>>>>> readers spine=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Calling Jin Jing HJ is the first sign of the world gone
wrong=
..=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Jin Jin from hero to zero(HJ) - a Chinese farce=94
> > >>>>>>> =93defaming [Jin Jin] is not patriotism=94
> > >>>>>>> =93Jin Jin from hero to zero - patriotism has lost its wit=94
>
> > >>>>>>> This proves China haters like to twist the facts to suit their
> > >>>>>>> anti- Chinese agenda. When they attack the ordinary Chinese
> > >>>>>>> netters as irrational, rabid - it is no longer about the
Chinese=
> > >>>>>>> government is it?
>
> > >>>>>> What's the agenda of those that claim pro-Tibetans are cowards
> > >>>>>> who only attack little girls?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> > >>>>> You are comparing apples and oranges.
> > >>>>> "Free Tibet" is a movement sup****ted by CIA/NED an dother quasi
> > >>>>> government agencies money. The Tibetan exiles' activities are
goal=
> > >>>>> directed. Concerning the attack, another netter had point out,
the=
> > >>>>> spoken persion stating in public that such attack the
defenseless
> > >>>>> girl was good. That is, good for publicity. Hence, the attack
was
> > >>>>> a mean to an end subordinated to thier pay masters' wish.
>
> > >>>>> The bigger issue, attacking the girl as well as the overall
effort=
> > >>>>> to disrupt the Olympic torch relay or the Olympic games do not
in
> > >>>>> anyway benefit the Tibetans in Tibet. China will not give up
their=
> > >>>>> legitimate claim on Tibet simply because of theartics peformed
by
> > >>>>> a small number of people.
>
> > >>>> How can you even say apples and oranges when you completely fail
to=
> > >>>> grasp what is being compared. It's the posters bmoore and
> > >>>> CharlesLiu and their agendas. If CharlesLiu thinks bmoore has an
> > >>>> agenda of demonizing Chinese then by the same standard he is
> > >>>> obviously guilty of demonizing Tibetans.
>
> > >>> Again, Lui and BM are not comparable because the evidence they
used
> > >>> are of different. In one case, the attack of the defenseless girl
is=
> > >>> lauded by the Vocie of Tibet spokeperson as something good because
> > >>> such attack promote international publicity. Implaction: The
attack
> > >>> is part of the plan and/or the attack conform to their overall
goal
> > >>> to gain publicity. There is no comparable spokeperson and
> > >>> comparable plan for the verbal attack on the same girl by netter
> > >>> who may or may not be Chinese or pro-China.
>
> > >> If you are not going to address the obvious attempt at demonization
> > >> of Tibetans by Charlesliu with the words, "Pro-Tibet cowards only
> > >> attack little girls" then there is nothing further to discuss.
>
> > > If one has problem with the post by Charles Liu, he or she should
feel=
> > > free to criticize him.
>
> > Which is what I did!
>
> Not true. Your first post of this thread is the following.
>
> "What's the agenda of those that claim pro-Tibetans are cowards who
> only
> attack little girls?"
>
> You are respoinding to Liu saying those who verbal attacked Jin are
> having an agenda.
No. That's not what he said. You misunderstood again.
You have no point, LT. You never do. You just try to rebut all
arguments which imply things that you wish weren't true.
People are on to you. You're not fooling anyone. Pfffft.
|
