Re: The Hypocrisy and Danger of Anti-China Demonstrations

On Sun, 04 May 2008 16:27:56 +0200, "Jakub A. Krzewicki"
<ebredel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>niedziela, 4 maja 2008 15:32. carbon entity 'Raymond' <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following letter:
>
>
>> Again what is your reason to speak for the former slave owner and
>> theocratic tyrant in opposing the current socialist government of
>> Tibetan people? Why do you feel compelled to speak for the apparent
>> evil dark religious force that has been proven beyond reasonable doubt
>> as the most brutal regime the world has ever known?
>
>If that realy is, why exactly they are most European Socialists and Green
>Leftists among those who sup****t DL, and not for example any American
>Christian Right, Catholic Sedevacantists or some likewise fundamentalist
>and rightist communities?

Do you always take the opinion of western political organizations as
the standard of truth?

>
>> Still, you have not shown the slightest evidence you know anything
>> about Chinese politics. So what's your reason to present your western
>> ****ing methods as the stupid "model" other than your shameless
>> arrogance and stupidity?
>
>Maybe nobody tried to explain me what's better in Chinese politics than
in
>Western democracy? Where was Chinese politics different from the
"absolute
>enlightened" monarchy from the middle of 18th century which tried to to
>model their policy upon the patern approximated to the Chinese one from
the
>age of Kangxi Emperor. Which model, as you know Western History, was
>discarded, often violently, a few decades after the first atempts of
>introducing.

Well, I sympathize your lack of knowledge in Chinese politics let
alone the contem****ary Chinese politics. But your gross arrogance in
sticking your ****ing nose into something you have no knowledge of is
disgusting to say the least.

>
>> Why is multi-party system is such a good thing? Is one criminal
>> organization not bad enough that you want more of them to exploit you
>> and rule over you?
>
>I always can seek in one party protection against the abuses of another
>party when they all are in a practical stalemate. When I sup****t
Socialists
>I can not only criticize but even French-fried-f..k the Liberal program
and
>vice versa. It's called pluralism.

In other word, having one robber occupying your entire house is
something too scary for you, therefore, you go out and invite as many
robbers as possible to all come to your house so that they can take
turns to rob you under negotiated procedures created by those robbers.

>
>I know obviously that the main feeding through in this pigsty is only
one,
>but every four years I can change the Yahoos who claim to represent me
for
>another ones. 

The problem for you is, they are all pigs.