niedziela, 4 maja 2008 21:12. carbon entity 'Raymond' <niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
contaminated talk.politics.tibet with the following letter:
> Do you always take the opinion of western political organizations as
> the standard of truth?
I'm far from it. A politician I elect is to stand for me and sometimes
even
lie for me in the parliament, just like an attorney I chose is to stand
for
me and sometimes even lie in my case in the court dispute which I can't do
because I swore to tell the truth.
You don't even know that the European parliaments were both the
legislatives
and judiciaries when they were established. They had both the right to
make
inquiries and to vote the projects of law signed by the kings.
With the time, the matter-of-the day judiciary cases went entirely to the
separate highest courts run by the professional judges, and they became
the
main legislatives whereas the king's (or later president's) role degraded
to a rubberstamp legislator --- sometimes with a certain ability to veto
--- and besides only a pure executive power. Only sometimes they execute
their right to make special comissions for the most urgent investigations.
With the other words the European legislatives remind the great civil
court
when each party tries to win the general law which they promised to they
electors (just like a particular executions are won in the courts) for
allowing another legal projest promoted by another party.
> Well, I sympathize your lack of knowledge in Chinese politics let
> alone the contem****ary Chinese politics. But your gross arrogance in
> sticking your ****ing nose into something you have no knowledge of is
> disgusting to say the least.
I try to find some knowlege but the ebooks avaliable online give too
different images of it that they are contradictory and it's easy to lose
in
the Babel library, so I chose those viewpoints more similar to the western
ones which I know myself, in order not to be misguided. Maybe I am wrong?
> In other word, having one robber occupying your entire house is
> something too scary for you, therefore, you go out and invite as many
> robbers as possible to all come to your house so that they can take
> turns to rob you under negotiated procedures created by those robbers.
I admire your sense of humor. But they rather remind the unloyal attorneys
at the following instances of the court dispute than robbers themselves.
They are unloyal, because there are really insufficient possibilities to
control them. But they in change have not excessive possibilities to
control the individual citizens, there is a margin of anarchy inscribed
even into the most sophisticated European bureaucracy.
Government tries to cir***vent the control of the citizens, citizens try
to
cir***vent the control of the government and both tolerate themselves. A
drunken equilibrium close to the ideal, something as the Seven Wise Men of
the Bamboo Tree made that system.
> The problem for you is, they are all pigs.
And from time to time they are slaughtered at the altar of public opinion,
so I told you the cultural revolution in the West is permanent. They are
not rulers, they are only the hired administrators. It't so much
difficult
to judge who is the real ruler in this carefree "Unordnung", but the world
goes round anyway.
--
tois egregorosin hena kai koinon kosmon einai
ton de koimomenon hekaston eis idion apostrephesthai
|
