On May 4, 12:57=A0pm, "Jakub A. Krzewicki" <ebre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> ... if the Dalai Lama was not ovethrown by chinese, he could be
overthrown=
> by the local military junta just like the Bogdo Gegen in outer Mongolia.
> But then the world would have much more less pretext to meddle into the
> internal Tibetan matters.
First, it is pretty egomaniac for a handful of European powers to
think themselves as the world. Second, EU as superpower wannabe, its
meddling into the Chinese internal matters is limited by its lack of
capacities and interests, not by the lack of pretext, regardless of
what China did or didn't.
> I think that the CCB made a big mistake when invaded Tibet, they just
> consciously took over the most of the karmic debt of the old regime to
> themselves. They just went with their hoofs onto the throne of the human
> slave owners.
Those cold blood European political calculations are very provincial.
PRC made a correct decision to regain the control of Tibet, and
eventually abolish slavery and uplifted majority of the population to
better lives. The good deeds done in the fifties and early sixties won
sup****t in Tibet and still form a solid base of sup****t for the
government.
> Power demoralizes, the absolute power demoralizes absolutely.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But there is no absolute power in
China today. For example, Hu has to share the power with the other
eight members of Politburo, and he can only serve two terms. One may
argue that he actually has less power than George Bush.
|
