On May 13, 11:16=A0am, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:12:14 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On May 13, 10:47?am, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 13 May 2008 10:05:33 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >On May 13, 8:36?am, Raymond <ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:01:12 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >> >On May 12, 3:58?pm, "ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
> >> >> >> The following link leads to a screen shot taken from a Germany
TV=
> >> >> >> program broadcasted by station N24. The picture was pu****ted to
> >> >> >> demonstrate that Tibetan lamas were under tight police control
in=
> >> >> >> connection with patriotic education. However the picture was a
fa=
ked
> >> >> >> one. First of all, the uniform worn by the police were at least
1=
0
> >> >> >> years out of date. Secondly, the composed nature of the picture
i=
s
> >> >> >> quite obvious when one considered the technicalities. For
example=
, the
> >> >> >> head of the lama on the right was surrounded by a narrow white
ed=
ge
> >> >> >> upon enlargement.
>
> >> >> >>http://img1.qq.com/news/pics/10372/10372992.jpg
>
> >> >> >> Link to the article originally appeared
>
> >> >>
>>http://news.wenxuecity.com/messages/200805/news-gb2312-593564.html=
>
> >> >> >And in LT's addled mind, this proves that all Western re****ts
about=
> >> >> >Tibet are false, and that the Chinese government is not part of
any=
> >> >> >repression in Tibet.
>
> >> >> >You're like a little boy, LT.
>
> >> >> Western bias against the Chinese government and the Chinese people
a=
re
> >> >> evident in everything they say. **** you for pretending to be a
fool=
..
> >> >> And your mother as well. She should suffer for your idiocy.
>
> >> >Wow, Ray. You are such a tool.
>
> >> Why? Because you are happy being ****ed?
>
> >Wow again, Ray. It's too bad all you really do is curse at people and
> >rarely say anything. It's like you're nothing, Ray.
>
> The point I'm making is to ***** you*.
But you didn't, Ray. You're just a loudmouth saying nothing.
> I'm glad you conceded my point.
But I didn't, Ray. You can't "win" just by claiming victory, Ray. Only
an empty-headed idiot would think you can. Oh, right.
|
