Mr. Lee's illogical arguments.

On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:59:12 +0800, ltlee1 wrote
(in article 
<1dfca676-055d-41a8-b695-4f5874d8311c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):

> 
> Yes. I consider the concpet of censorhip anachronistic. Rather, I see 
> governments managing their internal environment no different from
immigration 

> control and im****t control. Let me ask you this. When a government is 
> limiting the immigration of foreigners, is it not also "censoring" all
the 
> thoughts and ideas accompanying the foreigners from getting into the
country?

Logically gibberish.

If Mr. Lee thinks that censor****p is anachronistic and that censor****p is
no 
different than immigration control, then he must (logically) think 
immigration control is anachronistic :  "One that is out of its proper or 
chronological order, especially a person or practice that belongs to an 
earlier time".

So, Mr Lee must believe that immigration controls should be ended,  since 
they do not belong in this time.

He believes no such thing of course.

BTW, he uses the "immigration control" because his beloved PRC is not
faced 
with large numbers of foreigners trying to get in (guess why). Meanwhile 
Taiwan, the USA and similar free countries are facing that issue.

-- 
Love, Jim
(I often delete parts of the previous post and I often remove excessive 
crossposts.)


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----